为分析总结地面与井下地震观测系统的特点,以赤峰中心地震台地面与井下观测系统为研究对象,在噪声分析、噪声功率谱分析、地震监测能力和观测动态范围等方面进行分析。结果表明,2套观测系统的RMS均可达到Ⅱ级环境地噪声水平,井下观测系统噪声小于地面观测系统。对2套观测系统的功率谱密度、有效动态范围的对比均表明,井下观测系统的动态范围比地面观测系统超出约10%,因此,井下观测系统地震监测能力优于地面观测系统,井下观测系统能更有效地记录观测数据。
In order to analyze and summarize characteristics of ground and underground seismic observation systems, this paper takes ground and underground seismic observation systems at Chifeng Center Seismic Station as a research object to carry out noise analysis, noise power spectrum analysis, earthquake-monitoring capability and observation dynamic range analysis and comparison. The results show that the RMSs of both observation systems can achieve the level of environmental ground noise level Ⅱ, and the noise level of the underground observation system is lower than that of the ground observation system. The comparison of power spectrum density and effective dynamic range of the two observation systems show that the dynamic range of the underground observation system is about 10% larger than that of the ground observation system, showing that the earthquake-monitoring capability of the underground observation system is better than that of the ground observation system, so the underground seismic observation system can record the observation data more effectively.
2020,41(4): 100-104 收稿日期:2019-09-20
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2020.04.014
基金项目:内蒙古自治区地震局局长基金(项目编号:2019JC16)
作者简介:郭延杰(1989-),男,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事地震监测和系统运维工作。E-mail:562688756@qq.com
参考文献:
胡米东. 江苏省部分井下地震计监测能力差异初探[J]. 四川地震,2014,(4):31-34.
李雷,钱文品,邓存华,等. 昆明地震台地面与井下地震观测背景噪声对比[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2017,38(5):86-95.
李少睿,毛国良,王党席,等. 井下地震计方位角检测技术应用研究[J]. 地球物理学报,2016,59(1):299-310.
裴晓,尹继尧,杨庭春. 上海遥测台网各类型台基背景噪声分析[J]. 地球物理学进展,2012,27(5):1 897-1 903.
裴晓,尹继尧,杨庭春. 张江台地表与深井地震观测对比分析[J]. 地震工程学报,2013,35(2):366-371.
杨龙翔,王志铄,贾漯昭,等. 河南省测震台网背景噪声特征分析[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,2015,35(3):543-546.
张荣杉,冯武,彭澎,等. 宿迁地震台地震监测能力分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2017,38(4):199-202.
中国地震局监测预报司.测震学原理与方法[M].北京:地震出版社,2017:147-217.
朱音杰,刘檀,丁成,等. 赵县地震台地表及深井地震计观测数据对比分析[J]. 地震地磁观测与研究,2017,38(3):164-170.