从四分量钻孔应变仪基本原理式的分析出发,可知首先得到的物理量是岩石面应变和切应变及主应变的方位角,然后得到的最大、最小主应变是间接结果,建议多使用面应变和切应变的表示方法。由此说明当下需要重视灵敏系数A、B的实用化研究。据此思路,以云南省昭通地区2012年彝良M 5.7地震和2014年鲁甸M 6.5地震为例,对2次震中附近几台四分量钻孔应变仪记录的观测数据进行计算,初步分析表明,基于面应变和切应变的视角进行分析,其效果多优于以元件为单位的分析,可直接得到面应变和切应变异常及特征;2个面应变测量数据间的相关系数曲线,有时会在震前数天和震时出现异常变化,此新线索值得关注。
This paper starts with the simplest solution for a four-component strainmeter, directly obtain specific plane strain,shear strain and azimuthal angle of principal strain. It is pointed out that the maximum and minimum principal strains can be calculated afterwards and they are the result of the second stage. Then, the problems in practicality of the sensitivity coefficients A and B of plane strain and shear strain are discussed. Based on this idea, we analyzes the observation data of several four-component instruments near the epicenter of Yiliang M 5.7 earthquake in 2012 and Ludian M 6.5 earthquake in 2014 in Zhaotong area, Yunnan Province. It shows that drawing the figure based on the plane strain and shear strain is better than component readings obviously, which can significantly peel off respective abnormality of the plane strain and the shear strain. In addition, the correlation coefficient curve between measured data of two plane strains show significant anomalies often occur several days before and during the earthquake, which worth paying attention.
2018,39(5): 101-111 收稿日期:2018-03-01
DOI:10.3969/j.issn.1003-3246.2018.05.015
作者简介:苏恺之(1937-),男,研究员,1958年毕业于南开大学核物理专业,1972年起从事钻孔应力-应变仪器的实用化研究。E-mail:kaizhisu@qq.com
参考文献:
池顺良,张晶,池毅. 汶川、鲁甸、康定地震前应变数据由自洽到失洽的转变与地震成核[J]. 国际地震动态,2014,(12):3-13.
何德强,李亚芳,佘如昌,等. 2012年9月7日彝良5.7,5.6级地震的近场异常[J]. 地震研究,2014,37(1):1-8.
阚宝祥,邱泽华,唐磊. 泰安台钻孔差应变观测的实地标定[J]. 大地测量与地球动力学,2007,(6):119-123.
刘序俨,王紫燕,方宏芳,等. 对当前四分量钻孔应变观测的审视——以应变不变量为标尺[J]. 地球物理学报,2014,57(10):3 332-3 346.
邱泽华,阚宝祥,唐磊. 四分量钻孔应变观测资料的换算和使用[J]. 地震,2009,29(4):83-89.
邱泽华. 钻孔应变观测理论和应用[M]. 北京:地震出版社,2017.
萨文. 孔附近的应力集中[M]. 卢鼎霍,译. 北京:科学出版社,1958.
石井紘,浅井康広. Elastic Invariants Observed by Borehole Stress and Strain Meters and the Reliability of the Instrument[J].Zisin,2017,39(2):58-69.
苏恺之,何玉. 钻孔法地应力相对测量的误差问题[M]//国家地震局地震地质大队情报室. 地应力研究文集. 北京:地震出版社,1984.
苏恺之. 地应力测量方法[M]. 北京:地震出版社,1985.
苏恺之. 地应力相对测量方法[M]//苏恺之,李海亮,张钧,等. 钻孔地应变观测新进展. 北京:地震出版社,2003:252-260.
张凌空,牛安福. 分量式钻孔应变观测耦合系数的计算[J]. 地球物理学报,2013,56(9):3 029-3 037.
Gladwin M T. High-precision multicomponent borehole deformation monitoring[J]. Review of Scientific Instruments, 1984, 55(12):2 011-2 016.
Hast N. The measurement of rock pressure in mines[M]. Norstedt, Stockholm:Sveriges Geologiska Under, 1958:7-60.
Kong X Y, Su K Z, Fujinawa Y. Application Prospects of SKZ-1 4-component borehole strain meter[R]. Chiba, Japan:Japan Geoscience Union Meting, 2015.